Currently it says"John Byrne doesen't care about black people." and "Byrne has cited both Rob Liefeld and Erik Larsen as influences on his art style. " A few minutes ago it cited references to John Byrne rubbing Chris Claremont's back. While humorous, it clearly illustrates the lack of integrity that an open and unedited encyclopedia can attract.
Currently it says"John Byrne doesen't care about black people." and "Byrne has cited both Rob Liefeld and Erik Larsen as influences on his art style. " A few minutes ago it cited references to John Byrne rubbing Chris Claremont's back. While humorous, it clearly illustrates the lack of integrity that an open and unedited encyclopedia can attract.
Defiant1
Almost 6 months has passed yet the same insults to Byrne still exist unchanged and uncorrected. How pathetic.
RedAngel Creator & Honored Guest member is offline
SINNAMON Writer, Co-creator
Joined: Mar 2005 Gender: Male Posts: 136 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: Wikipedia garbage.... « Reply #2 on May 17, 2006, 10:33pm »
Quote:
Almost 6 months has passed yet the same insults to Byrne still exist unchanged and uncorrected. How pathetic.
Defiant1
Another month or so later, and John Byrne still doesn't care about black people. I'm surprised that ANYONE in their right mind considers Wikipedia a credible source for anything beyond entertainment.
Between you and me, someone should go there and scribble nonsense in as many entries as possible, just to make a point.
Joined: Feb 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 5,501 Location: Atlanta, GA
Re: Wikipedia garbage.... « Reply #3 on Mar 8, 2007, 12:29pm »
"It was, quite honestly, my impression that it was well known that I was not who I claimed to be, and that in the absence of any confirmation, no respectible (sic) publication would print it,"
This article pretty much confirms that Wkipedia is not a site which should be treated as an authority on anything.