Quato
Level 14
a.k.a. Defiant1
Quato a.k.a. Defiant1
Posts: 1,669 
|
Post by Quato on May 3, 2008 19:47:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by starbrand on May 4, 2008 10:49:10 GMT -5
From the intro the writer shows he can't stand Defiant, period. Shooter's concept doesn't work for everyone, I guess. |
|
Quato
Level 14
a.k.a. Defiant1
Quato a.k.a. Defiant1
Posts: 1,669
|
Post by Quato on May 4, 2008 12:23:01 GMT -5
From the intro the writer shows he can't stand Defiant, period. Shooter's concept doesn't work for everyone, I guess. He'd probably a fan of Youngblood & Rob Liefeld Q |
|
|
|
Post by starbrand on May 4, 2008 12:43:22 GMT -5
From the intro the writer shows he can't stand Defiant, period. Shooter's concept doesn't work for everyone, I guess. He'd probably a fan of Youngblood & Rob Liefeld Q ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Brother J on May 4, 2008 15:30:41 GMT -5
From the intro the writer shows he can't stand Defiant, period. Shooter's concept doesn't work for everyone, I guess. He'd probably a fan of Youngblood & Rob Liefeld Q With all the insight shown with that review, I would say you are probably right on the mark. The guy's mind was more than likely made up about the book before he even read the first page.  |
|
|
|
Post by gowaltrip on May 4, 2008 16:34:16 GMT -5
Yeah, I didnt get the impression the writer had a long history of reading comic books. I think he probably more in love with pose covers drawn by the hot artist of the month than a good story.
I will say that it does seem hard to believe the cover price was $3.50. That seems expensive even today, let alone 15 years ago. But otherwise, the review was worthless.
|
|
Quato
Level 14
a.k.a. Defiant1
Quato a.k.a. Defiant1
Posts: 1,669
|
Post by Quato on May 4, 2008 18:03:50 GMT -5
Yeah, I didnt get the impression the writer had a long history of reading comic books. I think he probably more in love with pose covers drawn by the hot artist of the month than a good story. I will say that it does seem hard to believe the cover price was $3.50. That seems expensive even today, let alone 15 years ago. But otherwise, the review was worthless. It was oversized if I recall correctly. Defiant was pretty good about tossing in extra story pages and selling for the same price as competitors that were offering less pages and more ads. Q |
|
